top of page

A Look Into the Working Standards of the Pharmaceutical Industry



In the pharmaceutical and chemical industries, the terms "reference standard," and "working standard," are commonly used to describe specific types of standards used for various analytical purposes. Each type of standard has a unique role in ensuring the accuracy and consistency of analytical measurements. Here's a detailed look at each:


1. Reference Standard:

Definition: A reference standard is a highly purified compound that is well-characterized and used to test the quality, purity, and potency of pharmaceutical substances and formulations. It often comes with a certificate of analysis. Source: Typically obtained from officially recognized sources such as pharmacopeial authorities (e.g., USP, EP) or national measurement institutes. Usage: Used in the validation of analytical methods, calibration of equipment, and as a control in quality assurance tests. Due to its high purity and reliability, it's the benchmark against which other standards are measured.


2. Working Standard:

Definition: A working standard, also known as an in-house or secondary standard, is a standard that is typically prepared in the laboratory from a batch of material that has been fully characterized by comparison against a reference standard. Purpose: Used for routine analysis. It's a practical and economical choice for day-to-day testing and quality control processes, where using the more expensive reference standard for every test would be impractical. Characterization: The working standard's quality, purity, and potency are established by comparing it against the reference standard. Once characterized, it is used for routine quality control tests until its validity period expires


Qualifying a working standard in the pharmaceutical industry

Qualifying a working standard in the pharmaceutical industry is a critical process that ensures the accuracy and consistency of analytical results. This process typically involves a series of steps to establish that the working standard is suitable for its intended use, especially in quality control and analytical testing. Here's a general guide on how to qualify a working standard:


1. Selection of Material

Source Material: Choose a high-quality batch of the compound that is representative of the material typically used. ·Characteristics: Ensure the material is stable, pure, and has similar characteristics to the reference standard.


2. Initial Characterization

Physical and Chemical Properties: Determine properties like melting point, moisture content, solubility, and appearance. Purity Assessment: Conduct tests to assess the purity. This can include methods like High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Gas Chromatography (GC), and others depending on the nature of the compound.


3. Comparison with Reference Standard

Analytical Testing: Compare the working standard against a certified reference standard using validated analytical methods. Parameter Testing: Test parameters like potency, identity, and impurities. Consistency: Ensure consistency in results across different batches.


4. Establishing Traceability

Documentation: Maintain detailed records of all tests and comparisons made with the reference standard. Traceability: Ensure that the qualification process and results can be traced back for review and auditing purposes.


5. Validation of Analytical Methods

Method Suitability: Validate the analytical methods used for testing the working standard. Reproducibility: Confirm that the methods produce consistent and reproducible results with the working standard.


6. Stability Testing

Long-term Stability: Assess the stability of the working standard under storage conditions over time. Accelerated Stability: Conduct accelerated stability testing to predict the long-term behavior.


7. Documentation and Approval

Documentation: Compile a comprehensive report including all test results, methods used, and conclusions. Approval Process: Submit the documentation for review and approval by the quality assurance department.


8. Establishing a Re-Evaluation Schedule

Periodic Testing: Schedule regular re-evaluation of the working standard to ensure ongoing reliability. Validity Period: Define a validity period after which the working standard should be re-qualified or replaced.


Conclusion Qualifying a working standard is a meticulous process that involves comparing it to a certified reference standard, validating analytical methods, and ensuring stability and traceability. The process is crucial for maintaining the integrity and reliability of analytical results in the pharmaceutical industry.


Understanding Potency Calculations for Pharmaceutical Standards:

The Need for Potency Calculation In pharmaceuticals, accurately determining the potency of a standard is essential for identifying the actual quantity of the standard weight. For instance, consider quantifying the assay for a paracetamol tablet. If you weigh 100 mg of a paracetamol standard with a potency of 98%, the actual standard weight to be used is 98 mg, not 100 mg. This corrected weight ensures precise drug formulation.

Calculating Potency on Different Bases

1. On a Dried Basis:

Formula: Percent Assay / (100 - Loss on Drying) × 100%. Example: If the percent assay is 99.0% and the loss on drying is 1.0%, the potency on a dried basis is 100.0%. This method is crucial when the standard is hygroscopic and dried before use.


2. On an Anhydrous Basis:

Formula: Percent Assay / (100 - Water Content) × 100%. Example: With a percent assay of 99.0% and water content of 0.4%, the potency on an anhydrous basis is 99.4%. This calculation is vital when determining water content in hygroscopic substances.


3. On an 'As Such' Basis:

Formula: Percent Assay (on dried or anhydrous basis) × (100 - Loss on Drying or Water Content) / 100. Example: If the percent assay on dried basis is 99.5% and the loss on drying is 0.5%, the potency on an 'as such' basis is 99.0%. This approach is used for non-hygroscopic standards without the need for drying or moisture evaluation.


Conclusion In conclusion, understanding these potency calculation methods is critical for ensuring accurate pharmaceutical formulations.


2 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Nice explanation

Like

Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

✅Nicely explained

Like
bottom of page